neunero.blogg.se - Sitesucker not working wikipedia

#Sitesucker not working wikipedia for free#
#Sitesucker not working wikipedia update#
#Sitesucker not working wikipedia download#
#Sitesucker not working wikipedia free#

Wikipedia can report your work after it is published and becomes part of accepted knowledge however, citations of reliable sources are needed to demonstrate that such material is verifiable, and not merely the editor's opinion. If you have completed primary research on a topic, your results should be published in other venues, such as peer-reviewed journals, other printed forms, open research, or respected online publications.

Primary (original) research, such as proposing theories and solutions, original ideas, defining terms, coining new words, etc.

Per our policy on original research, please do not use Wikipedia for any of the following: Wikipedia is not a place to publish your own thoughts and analyses or to publish new information. You may be looking for Wikipedia:Forum shopping or Wikipedia:Village pump. Prescriptive guides for prospective speakers of a language should be transwikied there. For a wiki that is a collection of textbooks, visit our sister project Wikibooks. See § Wikipedia is not a manual, guidebook, textbook, or scientific journal below for more information. Prescriptive guides for prospective speakers of such languages are not. Descriptive articles about languages, dialects, or types of slang (such as Klingon language, Cockney, or Leet) are desirable. Articles about the cultural or mathematical significance of individual numbers are also acceptable.

However, articles rarely, if ever, contain more than one distinct definition or usage of the article's title. In some cases, a word or phrase itself may be an encyclopedic subject, such as Macedonia (terminology) or truthiness. Encyclopedia articles are about a person, or a group, a concept, a place, a thing, an event, etc. In some cases, however, the definition of a word may be an encyclopedic subject, such as the definition of planet. If they cannot be expanded beyond a definition, Wikipedia is not the place for them. Articles should begin with a good definition or description, but articles that contain nothing more than a definition should be expanded with additional encyclopedic content. Missing dictionary definitions should be transwikied there. For a wiki that is a dictionary, visit our sister project Wiktionary. Wikipedia is not a dictionary, or a usage or jargon guide. Main page: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary

#Sitesucker not working wikipedia update#

Some topics are covered by print encyclopedias only in short, static articles, but Wikipedia can include more information, provide more external links, and update more quickly. Splitting long articles and leaving adequate summaries is a natural part of growth for a topic (see Wikipedia:Summary style).

#Sitesucker not working wikipedia download#

Keeping articles to a reasonable size is important for Wikipedia's accessibility, especially for readers with low-bandwidth connections and on mobile platforms, since it directly affects page download time (see Wikipedia:Article size).

#Sitesucker not working wikipedia free#

Consequently, this policy is not a free pass for inclusion: articles must abide by the appropriate content policies, particularly those covered in the five pillars. However, there is an important distinction between what can be done, and what should be done, which is covered under § Encyclopedic content below.

Other than verifiability and the other points presented on this page, there is no practical limit to the number of topics Wikipedia can cover, or the total amount of content. Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia, but a digital encyclopedia project. Style and format Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia

#Sitesucker not working wikipedia for free#

3.1 Wikipedia is not an anarchy or a forum for free speech.2.10 Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information.2.7 Wikipedia is not a manual, guidebook, textbook, or scientific journal.2.5 Wikipedia is not a blog, web hosting service, social networking service, or memorial site.2.4 Wikipedia is not a mirror or a repository of links, images, or media files.2.3 Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion.2.2 Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought.1.1 Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia.